check out this link
http://www.visordown.com/motorcyclenews/view/2009_suzuki_gsxr1000_pictures/5585.html
http://www.visordown.com/motorcyclenews/view/2009_suzuki_gsxr1000_pictures/5585.html
The pics are from suzuki - it's been officially released.looks like this thread hasn't been closed yet for the pics...
Agreed. I'll eat my hat if ANY of these bikes come close to those numbers in stock trim. Even measured at the crank those numbers seem awfully high. What's a MotoGP bike good for, 225? That's unobtanium with pneumatic valves and getting torn down every race.As I said, suzuki doesnt release power numbers so these are just guesses by some crazy enquirer style motorcycle webpage
post #84yo does anybody has bigger official pics ..??
can't see shit on the pics from the suzuki site ...
And the kicker is a Kawasaki oreinted site has more info today than what we find here!Gee so the two pics that I posted earlier in the week...... were right on.
Now you see why Suzuki asked to have them removed from this site.... because I **HAD** the correct pictures.
Only because someone cut and pasted the contents of the Global Suzuki site over there...And the kicker is a Kawasaki oreinted site has more info today than what we find here!
http://www.bikeland.org/story.php?storyID=42124
Only because someone cut and pasted the contents of the Global Suzuki site over there...
Simpler and lighter.I see they dropped the hydraulic clutch and went back to cable operated for 09....any ideas as to why?
That's what I assumed, I was just surprised since everyone who rides a K7/K8 that I've talked to seems to love the feel of their hydro clutch....Simpler and lighter.
if it's the weight that your looking for, then get the new Aprilia RSV4, it's 7kg lighter (fully loaded) then the CBR1000RR with out gasoline!With 191HP, I'm sure the motor will be awesome. But only a 5kg weight reduction? That is only 11 pounds. It will still weigh 24 pounds more than the Honda CBR1000RR!!!!!!
BTW, did Suzuki actually say this bike would be Revolutionary??