Suzuki GSX-R Motorcycle Forums Gixxer.com banner
1 - 7 of 7 Posts

BillV

· You should listen to me. No, seriously, listen to
Joined
·
14,189 Posts
Discussion starter · #1 · (Edited)
The spark plugs in my K6 have been there for years and I decided to replace them. The OEM plug was the NGK CR9E or Denso U27ESR-N. A simple upgrade would be an iridium plug like the CR9EIX or IU27. I like Denso's .4 mm center electrode, which provides less quenching and allows a bigger gap. However I've been aware of the IU27D, which projects further into the combustion chamber and should be better yet. It additionally has an inconel ground electrode and I'm a sucker for exotic materials. It and the NGK CR9EIA-9 were the OEM plugs on the K7-up 1000 and were also used on some YZF-R1's. Yet the Denso plug is impossible to find in the US - even with the Suzuki pn. I contacted Denso USA and they said that they've never imported them. Go figure. However they're available from overseas sellers, notably in the UK. So I bought some from gsparkplug.com and will shortly be installing them.

The Denso specs indicate that the IU27D extends 4 mm into the combustion center. That's much further than the OEM K6 plugs, though when asked, Denso wouldn't provide me with the specs of the common U27ESR-N (thanks again Denso USA!). It was enough that I was worried about the ground electrode to piston clearance, so I built a tool to measure it. It's shown here and you can see the clearance, 7.95 mm. That should be plenty.


Here's a comparison of the IU27D, CR9EIA-9, OEM U27ESR-N and the IU27. The IU27, the standard iridium replacement, is similar to the U27ESR-N except for the smaller iridium electrode. The CR9EIA-9 extends further into the combustion chamber and the IU27D extends even further. That puts the spark significantly closer to the center of the compressed charge.


I don't expect a big horsepower increase but, if nothing else, they ought to improve my mileage.
 
Good info, thanks Bill.

I remember discussing this with you some time back, I ended up with some CR9EIA-9 (k7 factory plugs), and my mileage definitely increased noticeably, fuel light took an extra 15-20km to turn on per a tank, having said that my old plugs were dual strap and rooted.

Last time around I went for some CR10EIA-9 and to my amazement the centre electrode did not protrude as the CR9EIA-9. I thought it would be identical other than the heat range... Turns out not.
 
Discussion starter · #4 · (Edited)
My spark plug pics all came from sparkplugs.co.uk. They don't have everything but generally have the best pics that I know of. I might have bought from them but they don't want to ship to the US.

Denso says that the CR10EIA9 cross references to their IU31, which looks like the IU27 above. That's strange as, like you, I would have expected it to look like the CR9EIA9. In terms of a colder plug, you might consider Denso's IU31D. The Denso specs have changed over time. It's currently listed as projecting 1 mm less than the IU27D. Its Suzuki pn is 09482-00559. But it's harder to find than the IU27D. You may have an easier time as the Denso's are coming from Japan.
 
That was I photo I took from my last plug change. I have the 10's in the bike atm, seems fine, I've run a pb mph with them and mileage is around the same so doesn't seem to have a made too much of a difference. I think the main thing is to keep them well serviced. I always prefer what the manual states however in this case the k5 and the k7 1000s run the same part number coils and the ignition dwell times are quite similar so going to what the k7 manual requires might not be so bad. In my case I've run pb mph with them so they can't be hurting power.
 
Discussion starter · #7 · (Edited)
No one here has done a back-to-back comparison of the IU27D and the CR9EIA-9. In fact, given the availability of the IU27D, it wouldn't surprise me if I was the only US rider to use them. I'd expect it to be slightly better but it's not been documented.
 
1 - 7 of 7 Posts