Suzuki GSX-R Motorcycle Forums Gixxer.com banner
21 - 27 of 27 Posts
Ducati can do very well in Britsh Superbike, where the tracks tend to be tighters and more curvy. In those instances, the 4-cylinders have to stay revved-down and don't get away as well out of corners like a twin can thumping along in its midrange at 6000 revs.

That, and if Ducati is getting the horsepower figures out of their bikes they claim to, then I'd say they've pretty much tapped out the flow of power from a v-twin.

If Bayliss can get out in front, he can walk away from the pack like he is on a light-speed machine. So I think DUcati's U.S. effort just isn't up to the challenge. And like we all know, Ducati is about the image--If they are losing, so is their image.

Besides, if you have ever sat on a Ducati, they feel cheap--at least to me. The base model 999 ($17,000) feels really cheap and looks so damn plain it isn't funny. The top-of-the-line 999R ($32,000) feels little different and is quite plain underneath the fanfare of "Ducati red" paint and miscellaneous WSBK decals. Aprilia is where it is at in Italy!

The next we'll see of Ducati will probably be with them unvailing a new 4-cylinder machine.

-J
 
njracer said:
Lets see......why should WSB, BSB and the all Japan series (kind of like the AMA but in Japan) change to the AMA. Make the AMA change so there are common rules. Then, the MFG's would only have to develope one superbike and FWIW, the World Super Bikes are more developed than the AMA SB's.
I guess my point is that the rules are really driven by the market. Hence why we love the hell out of the Superbike races, but don't have a 250 race on Sunday's. I think its important to have a variation of rules. Who is to say one set of rules is better than the other? Someone will always have a reason to bitch.

.
 
CASINO said:
Who is to say one set of rules is better than the other? Someone will always have a reason to bitch.

.
True, but if you have one set of rules for superbikes worldwide, the mfg's only have to develope one bike. That will free up a bunch of R&D money which could go to funding more factory teams.

njracer
 
njracer said:
True, but if you have one set of rules for superbikes worldwide, the mfg's only have to develope one bike. That will free up a bunch of R&D money which could go to funding more factory teams.

njracer
Your idea is based on an the assumption that a manfucturer's racing budget is fixed worldwide, and that the manufcaturer will spend all of it. I think its more logical to assume that if they only had to develop one bike, they'd just save the additional research money and/or put it into retail product development.
 
po-po 5.0 said:
Your idea is based on an the assumption that a manfucturer's racing budget is fixed worldwide, and that the manufcaturer will spend all of it. I think its more logical to assume that if they only had to develop one bike, they'd just save the additional research money and/or put it into retail product development.
I did say...."which could go into funding more factory teams".

Anywho, one set of rules for superbikes worldwide could only be good for the sport.
 
njracer said:
True, but if you have one set of rules for superbikes worldwide, the mfg's only have to develope one bike. That will free up a bunch of R&D money which could go to funding more factory teams.

njracer
Personally I don't think that would happen. They would simply report higher profits (maybe - if the product each mfg settled on sold well) . R&D money would stay the same and factory team numbers wouldn't increase much. The logistics of scouting, signing and supporting riders would outweigh the benefits of the current trend of 2 or 3 riders on a factory team.

And again it all goes back to market demand. There is no motivation for what happens to sales in Europe/Asia when the 125 and 250 are phased out in favor of larger displacement bikes (which incidentally people in those countries widely cant afford or aren't allowed to posess)?

The current setup is just fine the way it is. The problem with AMA racing is right now it has no commercial appeal. If it were to follow the mold of NASCRAP there would be a ton of secondary sponsors for privateers, which would also add to R&D bucks for privateers, not to mention less costly high quality parts.

.
 
21 - 27 of 27 Posts