I want to know what was "lucky" in that game. That was a great game by 2 good teams. That catch at the end was NOT luck, it was skill. And it was the offense that moved the ball for a winning drive, and the min Defense held the Niners to what was it? Oh yeah like 10 3 and outs. Not luck.You gotta be kidding me about the Vikings.
They've played the Browns, Lions and 49ers! Got the Packers then Rams. Packers need to get back to them selves. Vikings are gonna have a tough road when they actually play some solid ball clubs. Luck wont be on their side as it was with the niners.
Broncos: Bengals, Browns, Raiders... They get toss right in to the fire... Cowboys, Pats, Chargers, Ravens, Steelers....
They have played surprisingly well thus far though.
Double or nothing both Vikings & Broncos lose next week.![]()
I'm not stupid. :lmaoDouble or nothing both Vikings & Broncos lose next week.![]()
Luck: When preponderation and hard work meets opportunity. I couldn't have made either one of those plays and if you could you should try out for a NFL post haste.Greg Lewis sorry ass making a big time catch from Farve getting rocked as he threw the ball. with the saftey draped on him as time pretty much expired = Luck. But crazy shit happens all the time. Like Stokley catching a tipped ball to beat the Bungles.
Yeah but stalling out in the red zone is what separates the good teams from the great teams. If they're going to survive the rest of the schedule they're going to need to figure out a way to get a TD each and every time. Otherwise they're not looking too bad. Protecting the ball and doing what they need to do for the most part. I just don't want to see them get behind and have to rely on the arm of Orton.Broncos are 3-0!!!unk
unk
unk The rest of the schedule is definitely rough, hopefully the defense can win a few more games for a relatively anemic offense. I did see some hope in the offense this weekend though. The Raiders D has been doing a good job so far but Denver managed to move the ball pretty well against them; they just stalled out in the red-zone.
I totally agree with you, it will suck if they have to play catch up. Orton makes some bad throws and throws at the ground a lot :lol , but at least he isn't throwing picks.Yeah but stalling out in the red zone is what separates the good teams from the great teams. If they're going to survive the rest of the schedule they're going to need to figure out a way to get a TD each and every time. Otherwise they're not looking too bad. Protecting the ball and doing what they need to do for the most part. I just don't want to see them get behind and have to rely on the arm of Orton.hmy
That's true but he hasn't really had to play from behind yet. Easy to play from ahead when your best weapon is a solid run game. Playing from behind means they're relying on Orton's arm when the defense knows he's throwing and then they're in trouble.I totally agree with you, it will suck if they have to play catch up. Orton makes some bad throws and throws at the ground a lot :lol , but at least he isn't throwing picks.