Quote:
Originally Posted by modog
Thanks. I should have mentioned that I just had my front forks done. New fluid. The tech checked out the rear and said it was still good. (Street wise of course) Track is a different matter. He also said that the 02 rear shock doesn't take nitrogen. Is that correct? Also how do you revalve a rear shock? Isn't it just a large spring?
|
First off, there's no way the tech could have determined anything about the condition of your stock shock, except that maybe it's not leaking fluid, without disassemblying it. You can't just look at it and say 'its fine'. After 40K miles, the fluid is crap, the shaft bushing is likely worn, and the seals may or may not need replacing. Anyone who knows suspension would tell you 40K miles is definitely overdue for service. Then again... not many people know suspension. This guy is one of them.
Anyone that would say that shock doesn't take nitrogen DOES NOT need to be working on your bike!

Seriously... don't ever let him touch it again. Don't even let him look at it. Yes... it takes nitrogen.
As far as valving goes... the spring controls load bearing. The valving (which for learning purposes is an orificed piston that moves through fluid, thus creating damping force) is internal. Revalving - for simplicities sake - adds 'control', and can greatly improve rideability & traction.
Quote:
Originally Posted by modog
If I shim under the stock shock for the max of 5-7mm do you think it would make a very noticeable difference on the track?
|
Yes - don't think... know. HUGE difference.
Quote:
Originally Posted by modog
Sorry for my ignorance on some of these questions? Better to ask than to pretend I know.
|
You're not ignorant. You're asking questions to learn. That's smart.
Your tech is the one who's ignorant!!!!