I appreciate the fact that you clearly tried to pass on some of your knowledge about counties and local cities. However, the constitution will never be considered in any argument based on the weather. The aforementioned will always be true, unlike something that is usually true.
My sole intention here is to highlight some of your errors to an otherwise informative post.
Not sure if serious and / or retarded but this is consistent with a lot of your posts.
Just a thought: Put the thesaurus down and put more thought into articulating your thoughts in a coherent manner.
Not sure if serious and / or retarded but this is consistent with a lot of your posts.
Just a thought: Put the thesaurus down and put more thought into articulating your thoughts in a coherent manner.
i get a chuckle out of the people who think that something i write is either serious or retarded... because it can't be anything else right?
dry sarcasm escapes you i imagine. i don't actually use a thesaurus as i type on my multiple computers but i appreciate the compliment?
if i need to explain the post you quoted, then i would honestly have to lower my rather high standards for fellow gdc peeps (to a fault at times admittedly) in terms of their grasp of language. i don't really want to do that, despite your difficulties :l
thank you for your thoughts skid
maybe ask these guys if you still don't get it
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knight2211
Quote:
Originally Posted by JetBlast
this is getting fun
__________________
"serious is for real for serious." -resident captain justice
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacBayne
the forum is blessed to have you here. your insight is boundless.
i get a chuckle out of the people who think that something i write is either serious or retarded... because it can't be anything else right?
dry sarcasm escapes you i imagine. i don't actually use a thesaurus as i type on my multiple computers but i appreciate the compliment?
if i need to explain the post you quoted, then i would honestly have to lower my rather high standards for fellow gdc peeps (to a fault at times admittedly) in terms of their grasp of language. i don't really want to do that, despite your difficulties :l
thank you for your thoughts skid
maybe ask these guys if you still don't get it
oh.. no. I'm a big fan of sarcastic humor and do see the point you were trying to make. It's just the verbose, droning, out-of-context drivel that is typical of your writing style that I'm commenting on.
I'm all for people who are well-spoken. On the other hand, people who aren't well-spoken but who still try to write beyond their capacity for articulation / eloquence only manage to make make things painful to read.
I'm sure when you read your writing, it looks fine to you
oh.. no. I'm a big fan of sarcastic humor and do see the point you were trying to make. It's just the verbose, droning, out-of-context drivel that is typical of your writing style that I'm commenting on.
I'm all for people who are well-spoken. On the other hand, people who aren't well-spoken but who still try to write beyond their capacity for articulation / eloquence only manage to make make things painful to read.
I'm sure when you read your writing, it looks fine to you
lol. So you've missed the point entirely, which is as follows: using the words he used incorrectly to reallocate them towards a statement that's not completely false despite the difficulty.
So tell me, in your articulation and eloquence, how having done this was beyond my capacity.
As for things that are painful for you to read, might I suggest some tears for those rivers you've been crying
lol. So you've missed the point entirely, which is as follows: using the words he used incorrectly to reallocate them towards a statement that's not completely false despite the difficulty.
So tell me, in your articulation and eloquence, how having done this was beyond my capacity. (re-read the last sentence of drivel you just wrote and you'll see)
As for things that are painful for you to read, might I suggest some tears for those rivers you've been crying
Do you know what 'allocate' means and how out of context it is the way you tried to use it? You prove my point... again
And again, since you seem to have missed it last time: I did catch your little sarcastic dig. It wasn't hard to make out. Understand this time?
It's funny / ironic when someone tries to show-off their mastery of a language and fails. It's kinda' like a squid who thinks that everyone at starbucks is impressed because he shows-up on a litrebike.... even after he falls-over in the parking lot.
It's kinda' like a squid who thinks that everyone at starbucks is impressed because he shows-up on a litrebike.... even after he falls-over in the parking lot.
Precisely why I now ride a 600. They are so much easier to pick up after falling over.