|
: Dynoed: Sounds kinda low to me hustleman 01-13-2005, 10:38 AM Just go the bike dynoed.. Here are the results 100.39 hp @ 13750rpm 44.6 tq @ 10800rpm. 03 GSX-R600 Yoshi RS-3 full exhaust, PCIIIr What do you think. closetotheedge 01-13-2005, 01:10 PM Yep, it does look a tad low. Ask the tuner what othe gixxer 600`s are getting on that dyno. 01Gixxer1000 01-13-2005, 01:15 PM what kind of Dyno was it and was it measured in STD or SAE? hustleman 01-13-2005, 01:24 PM 01Gixxer1000 said: what kind of Dyno was it and was it measured in STD or SAE? Will have to ask the guy that? What would be the difference? closetotheedge 01-13-2005, 01:40 PM SAE will give you a lower reading than STD. Got this off a tuner. Don`t know about the accuracy but it should give you the idea. 159.99 STD = 154.97 SAE = 158.30 DIN = 154.91 EEC = 155.38 JIS = 158.94 UNCORRECTED Philbie 01-13-2005, 01:41 PM Roughly 3-5hp. Some say more, my tuner says about 3% if I remember correctly. 01Gixxer1000 01-14-2005, 12:43 AM yip...that sounds right.... On the Dyno's..there is the inertia vs. eddie current one gives lower readings.... I personally like the Dynojet 250...Its currently the latest one out from Dynojet...Once you find a Dyno and Tech you like, stick with them so that all of your numbers are consistant... you da man 01-31-2005, 07:10 AM When you said "dynoed" are you meaning mapped or just did a dyno "run" or "pull" for HP and torque? Sounds a little low if you just got it mapped. Did you get a baseline run to compare it to? That is the main thing. Compare your before and after HP, torque, and fuel/air. The dyno could read 95HP before and then 100HP after or could say 105HP before and 110HP after. Either way its still a 5HP gain. gixxerguy77 01-31-2005, 11:53 AM sounds right to me! gixxer75019320 02-18-2005, 12:22 PM l sport rider dynoed that same year 600 and got that stock he has full exhaust and a p/c III r i say take it to get it tuned gixxerguy77 02-18-2005, 01:15 PM need to make sure you read the fine print about how the dyno was read.. sometime it shows a dyno sheet corrected for humidity and elevation... dont waste your time with those numbers.. NastyC4 03-01-2005, 08:09 AM i agree with many of the above posts. dont freak out and DONT compare your numbers with any set of numbers unless done with a same bike on the same dyno back to back... even then theres the variability between bikes to account for. Find out what kind of dyno it is. in toronto last year with my 03 600... with 1200 km on the bike it dynoed 97.7 rwhp. after an exhaust and full tune i got it up to 107 rwhp. im sure the extra mileage also helped ont hat dyno. To me those numbers are accurate. also remember not everyone wants to admit low dyno numbers... and may possibly lie to make themselves feel better. go to any hangout and ask any rider you dont know his hp and chances are he'll BS you his #s.. LOL http://www.gixxer.com/forums/images/graemlins/cheers.gif NastyC4 03-01-2005, 08:14 AM just realized that your biek has the mods already... Still depends on too many variable to judge ...But has the biek been tuned?? using a map frym dynojet is an ass idea in my opinion. the dynojet maps are created at different altitudes and conditions depending on where you live... and in many cases can LOSE hp than without the pc3. As evidenced by a recent magazine article. if your bike hasnt been tuned properly.... get it done.. my bike without tune only made 101 rwhp with the base map in my yosh ems i had in it. after tune did i get the better numbers and better numbers through the ENTIRE range i may add. http://www.gixxer.com/forums/images/graemlins/cheers.gif 01Gixxer1000 03-01-2005, 08:37 AM I concur... pushindalimit 03-02-2005, 02:09 AM Sounds about right, I think.... I had my o2 600 akro bolt on, tre and pc111 put on the dyno and mapped.... First run it was 96 hp and after tuning it went to 101.9 hp... Whicjh the guy said was decent.... | ||