But a 250/300 isn't fast enough!!! - Suzuki GSX-R Motorcycle Forums Gixxer.com
 9Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 25 (permalink) Old 01-13-2016, 05:58 AM Thread Starter
On hiatus...
 
Anthony D's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Jersey
Motorcycle: Whatever oldgixxer has in his garage...
Posts: 72,590
Garage
Cool But a 250/300 isn't fast enough!!!

For anyone who says they will get bored or a 250/300 as a first bike, check this out:



That is a Honda CBR300R setting a new lap record at Chuckwalla Raceway.

Anthony D is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 25 (permalink) Old 01-13-2016, 06:12 AM
I CAN tell the difference between a squirrel and a monkey...
 
oldgixxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In the garage, smoking one of Anthony D's cigars...
Motorcycle: None, gave them all to Anthony D...
Posts: 22,322
Re: But a 250/300 isn't fast enough!!!

oldgixxer is offline  
post #3 of 25 (permalink) Old 01-13-2016, 06:51 AM
Vegemite-eating SuperModerator...
 
8you4t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Gippsland AUSTRALIA
Motorcycle: K3 GSXR 1000/2011 R1/2004 CBR 600RR track bike / 1994 GSXR 750/1996 CBR900RR / 2002 sv650s (wifes) /2003 CBR600RR / 2006 CBR 1000RR / 1997 GSXR 600 / 2001 RSV Aprilia 1000 / 2011 Z1000 / 2006 VTR 1000
Posts: 10,782
Re: But a 250/300 isn't fast enough!!!

Wicked ... But it doesn't make the panties drop like a thou
Johnny English likes this.
8you4t is online now  
post #4 of 25 (permalink) Old 01-13-2016, 07:00 AM
Lifetime Premium
 
-JK750-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Finland
Motorcycle: K5 1000
Posts: 3,071
Re: But a 250/300 isn't fast enough!!!

Indianapolis, Indiana

August 7, 2015

Superbike/Superstock 1000 Superpole Results (All on Dunlop tires):

1. Cameron Beaubier (Yamaha), SBK, 1:37.247, best top speed in Superpole 190.747 mph

2. Roger Hayden (Suzuki), SBK, 1:37.949, 188.554 mph

3. Josh Hayes (Yamaha), SBK, 1:38.343, 185.708 mph

14. Elena Myers (Suzuki), SBK, 1:42.648


Moto2
1. Alex Rins SPA Paginas Amarillas HP 40 (Kalex) 1m 36.549s
2. Tito Rabat SPA EG 0,0 Marc VDS (Kalex) 1m 36.686s
3. Mika Kallio FIN Italtrans Racing Team (Kalex) 1m 36.865s

Moto3
1. Danny Kent GBR Leopard Racing (Honda) 1m 40.703s
2. Miguel Oliveira POR Red Bull KTM Ajo (KTM) 1m 40.791s

1 Marc MARQUEZ Repsol Honda Team Honda 343.6km/h 1’31.884
-JK750- is offline  
post #5 of 25 (permalink) Old 01-13-2016, 07:30 AM
Lifetime Premium
 
kevinc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: PA
Motorcycle: 2008 SV650S
Posts: 1,124
Re: But a 250/300 isn't fast enough!!!

I read Motorcyclist magazine but wow didn't know how quick a rider Ari is. Good shit.
kevinc is offline  
post #6 of 25 (permalink) Old 01-13-2016, 08:06 AM
Drunkz again
 
Carnage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: was Boston, now Orlando
Motorcycle: 2006 GSX-R1000
Posts: 13,542
Garage
Re: But a 250/300 isn't fast enough!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinc View Post
I read Motorcyclist magazine but wow didn't know how quick a rider Ari is. Good shit.

Same here when it comes to the mag. I always read his reviews on bikes but didn't know he was that talented nowadays.
Carnage is offline  
post #7 of 25 (permalink) Old 01-13-2016, 08:36 AM
That's "Mr. Chalet" to you...
 
le skid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Montréal
Posts: 4,865
Re: But a 250/300 isn't fast enough!!!

Awesome video Reminds me of that ninja 250 on Laguna Seca

In my mind, this proves what has been said soooo many times out here: that 99.99% of riders will actually be better / faster riders on a smaller bike.

On a 1000, I build-up more speed on any straight but then I'm guessing which brake marker I can wait until, before bleeding-off my speed. Then I'm guessing when to let off the brakes to settle-in to the turn, then RE-accelerating in the turns until I've reached the end of my courage.

Then I watched the guy in this video. Watch him at 1:45 as the brake markers approach.
  • 3....... still wide open.
  • 2....... still wide-open
  • 1....... stil wide-open and throw it into the right-hander

I'm not a pro. Managing my speed up & down wastes MORE conscious effort than simply focusing on my lines and BP. My next track whore will be a 600... and even then, I should still probably go for a smaller twin.


.
fuzzdangerous likes this.

.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cainyboy View Post
I've run out of french jokes. You're a cunt.
le skid is offline  
post #8 of 25 (permalink) Old 01-13-2016, 08:53 AM
Lifetime Premium
 
kevinc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: PA
Motorcycle: 2008 SV650S
Posts: 1,124
Re: But a 250/300 isn't fast enough!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carnage View Post
Same here when it comes to the mag. I always read his reviews on bikes but didn't know he was that talented nowadays.
Yeah I'll keep this in mind when reading his review on how a bike handles.

Quote:
Originally Posted by le skid View Post
Awesome video Reminds me of that ninja 250 on Laguna Seca

In my mind, this proves what has been said soooo many times out here: that 99.99% of riders will actually be better / faster riders on a smaller bike.

On a 1000, I build-up more speed on any straight but then I'm guessing which brake marker I can wait until, before bleeding-off my speed. Then I'm guessing when to let off the brakes to settle-in to the turn, then RE-accelerating in the turns until I've reached the end of my courage.

Then I watched the guy in this video. Watch him at 1:45 as the brake markers approach.
  • 3....... still wide open.
  • 2....... still wide-open
  • 1....... stil wide-open and throw it into the right-hander

I'm not a pro. Managing my speed up & down wastes MORE conscious effort than simply focusing on my lines and BP. My next track whore will be a 600... and even then, I should still probably go for a smaller twin.


.
For real, this is from the video description:

"To cover Chuckwalla’s 2.7 miles and 17 turns Ari averaged 81 mph, just 11 mph slower than a stock CBR300’s outright top speed of 92 mph. And, of the less-than two minutes it took to do the lap, the bike was wide open for one minute eleven seconds, or 60 percent of the lap."
kevinc is offline  
post #9 of 25 (permalink) Old 01-13-2016, 09:21 AM
Expert
 
Motionelco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: California
Motorcycle: 2011 gsxr750
Posts: 2,626
Re: But a 250/300 isn't fast enough!!!

Yeah small bikes are pretty damn sweet . I loved my girls Ninja 250.
Motionelco is online now  
post #10 of 25 (permalink) Old 01-13-2016, 10:59 AM
Amateur
 
TennisFreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Texas
Motorcycle: ZX-10R
Posts: 578
Garage
Re: But a 250/300 isn't fast enough!!!

Pretty sweet.

But to be clear that was lap record for the class, not the track.

1:46 by a 1000 has the track record.
Johnny English likes this.
TennisFreak is offline  
post #11 of 25 (permalink) Old 01-14-2016, 07:23 AM
Drunkz again
 
Carnage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: was Boston, now Orlando
Motorcycle: 2006 GSX-R1000
Posts: 13,542
Garage
Re: But a 250/300 isn't fast enough!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Motionelco View Post
I loved my girls Ninja 250.
So did I. Yeah my lady had an 08 Model when they first redesigned it and that bike was a blast to ride! I'm definitely considering that class if I ever decide to go racing again. Folks don't realize how much fun they are! I wish I could have a go on one of the new 300s.
Carnage is offline  
post #12 of 25 (permalink) Old 01-14-2016, 08:03 AM
That's "Mr. Chalet" to you...
 
le skid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Montréal
Posts: 4,865
Re: But a 250/300 isn't fast enough!!!

This thread has great potential to end-up being stickied, as a resource to point noobs at when they announce they're looking for an SS as their first bike.


I'm seeing the littler bikes as a no-brainer option for learners but for old timers, only under 2 out of (my) 3 main riding scenarios:
  1. track / sport riding
  2. short-mid range commuting
  3. big rides

track / sport riding: Hell yeah
I've been riding since the early 80s but I'm sure if I had one of these smaller bikes, I'd be a MUCH better rider within 4-5 track days.

short-mid range commuting
I'd give them a pass but probably a 7/10. An older fuck like me, who has only really ridden big bore bikes for 30+ years would definitely find 'em fun to tool around on, yes. For practical purposes (gas / plates / insurance / tires) they're a no-brainer. The issue I could foresee is that I'm spoiled with big-bore torque and gearing, which makes stop & go traffic much less work / shifting, as has been discussed out here many times. This isn't an issue for younger riders though, who without the benefit of decades of muscle-memory and clutch/brake/throttle finesse, are as likely to wad-up a supersport in traffic as they are to arrive at work / school safely.

Big rides
When I go for a day ride, it's around 50 minutes of slab / secondary routes to get to where the twisties begin up north. Same thing to come home. So if I bother, I'll ride for 5-6 hours up there to make it worthwhile.

I've sometimes become impulsive when I get far enough west of Montreal and ended-up popping in to say hi to my folks (300 miles away).

This is the only application where I can't see an R3 cutting it. Smaller ergos, smaller tank / range, higher revs etc.. don't sound to me as a relaxing big-ride mount.

Final caveat... many of us older fucks might be slightly 'more developed' around the waistline. I go up & down between 190 - 205. I wonder if a 500 twin would deliver the same fun / learning experience as a 250-300, with just a little more oomph to haul a fatter ass around?



.

.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cainyboy View Post
I've run out of french jokes. You're a cunt.
le skid is offline  
post #13 of 25 (permalink) Old 01-14-2016, 08:31 AM
Dont take ANY of my advice, EVER, when it comes to riding motorycles.
 
Mr645's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Boca Raton, Florida
Motorcycle: 2003 GSXR 1000
Posts: 1,476
Re: But a 250/300 isn't fast enough!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kz03sQeX02c

250 vs big bikes
Johnny English likes this.
Mr645 is offline  
post #14 of 25 (permalink) Old 05-20-2016, 07:29 PM
Drunk Again
 
tatersalad314's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Texas
Motorcycle: L5 600, '15 Victory Vegas 8-Ball
Posts: 2,518
Re: But a 250/300 isn't fast enough!!!

Seriously considering purchasing a CBR300R tomorrow...
tatersalad314 is offline  
post #15 of 25 (permalink) Old 05-21-2016, 05:14 AM
Amateur
 
Johnny English's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 308
Re: But a 250/300 isn't fast enough!!!

I'd like to buy a 250/300 purely for track
I'll have to try and convince the lady lol
Johnny English is offline  
post #16 of 25 (permalink) Old 05-21-2016, 07:07 AM
Drunk Again
 
tatersalad314's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Texas
Motorcycle: L5 600, '15 Victory Vegas 8-Ball
Posts: 2,518
Re: But a 250/300 isn't fast enough!!!

If I decide to go out and get it today, it will be double duty for sure.
tatersalad314 is offline  
post #17 of 25 (permalink) Old 05-26-2016, 01:54 PM
Amateur
 
springfall2008's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: South West, UK
Motorcycle: 2014 GSXR1000
Posts: 834
Garage
Re: But a 250/300 isn't fast enough!!!

Personal opinion here (please be kind)... track wise I'd fully agree that unless you are _really_ good a litre superbike isn't your best bet - I think I'd be quite scared of riding mine on the track and I'm sure my lap times would suffer.

However, on the street while I think a CBR300 would be fun, I think I'd get fed up pretty quickly of having to "ring it's neck" all the time and most likely get caught out overtaking and keeping up with traffic sometimes - basically I'd be too lazy to ride it well all the time.

Now having jumped onto my wife's SV650 I think it's a perfect starter big bike for the road, it's comfortable, easy to ride and more than enough power for any new rider.

But... after being on the Thundercat 600 for 10 years and coming from my current GSXR1000 I did find the SV650 lacking that massive power boost you get on the bigger bikes. Do you need that, no? Do I want it - hell yes Would I recommend a sports bike for a new rider - no!
springfall2008 is offline  
post #18 of 25 (permalink) Old 05-26-2016, 02:29 PM
Likes Diiiiiiiiiiiiiiicks
 
Just_Nick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Motorcycle: 2006 GSXR "250"
Posts: 1,753
Garage
Re: But a 250/300 isn't fast enough!!!

Correction: unless you're maxing out the capacities of a modified 600 (AKA eliminating 99.99% of riders), a litre superbike is not your best bet.
A 250 or 300 would be a good bike to wring out on a small track, it'd be more challenging on a large track. That's why a 600 is a good compromise for those larger tracks, though you'll occasionally have the beast rider on a 300 passing you.
Just_Nick is online now  
post #19 of 25 (permalink) Old 05-26-2016, 05:37 PM
Squid
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Motorcycle: Chris Turner
Posts: 6
Re: But a 250/300 isn't fast enough!!!

Not that I don't agree that one would be a solid choice for a first bike, but that's not exactly a great argument for someone not getting bored with one considering 99% of riders will only be street cruising, where the lack of power will still get old real quick for most.
ctprelude is offline  
post #20 of 25 (permalink) Old 05-26-2016, 05:38 PM
Dont take ANY of my advice, EVER, when it comes to riding motorycles.
 
Mr645's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Boca Raton, Florida
Motorcycle: 2003 GSXR 1000
Posts: 1,476
Re: But a 250/300 isn't fast enough!!!

pretty fast, especially considering how many brake markers he missed
Mr645 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Suzuki GSX-R Motorcycle Forums Gixxer.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome